The Rise of the “Taylor Swift Tax” (And Other Vacancy Taxes)

Across the country, real estate investors and property owners are facing new challenges as states and cities roll out creative tax policies. From vacancy taxes to luxury home assessments, these rules are changing what it means to own real estate. In a recent discussion, David Moore, Tom Moore, and Paul Locatelli examined how these changes are playing out in markets like San Francisco, Hawaii, and Rhode Island, and what they mean for investors trying to make smart decisions.

The Rise of Vacancy Taxes

Tom Moore opened the conversation by mentioning the idea of a vacancy tax, which has already been implemented in several large cities. San Francisco, for example, has a version of vacancy tax for commercial real estate and storefronts. Funnily enough, this idea did not actually originate in the US, but first took hold in Vancouver, BC in Canada.

The purpose of these taxes is to target homes that remain empty for long periods; however, Tom questioned whether such policies actually help or just add complexity for property owners.

The “Taylor Swift Tax” in Rhode Island

Paul Locatelli brought up a new term making headlines: the “Taylor Swift tax.” He explained that in Rhode Island, homeowners who own properties valued over one million dollars that are not their primary residence are now being hit with a significant additional tax.

This type of measure, Paul said, shows how states are increasingly finding new ways to target high-value or non-resident properties.

Hawaii’s Complicated Tax Structure

When the discussion turned to Hawaii, David Moore explained that the state’s property tax system has become especially complicated. He said, “They have three different taxes with property taxes. They’re a mess.”

Paul had asked whether Hawaii was planning a non-resident tax, and David confirmed that such measures already exist and contribute to the overall confusion in Hawaii’s property market.

Changing Rules for Property Owners

David Moore reflected on how policies like mansion taxes, vacancy taxes, and non-resident property taxes are spreading. He noted that Los Angeles now has a mansion tax, further evidence of this national trend.

David summed up the issue by saying that while it used to be that your real estate was your business, today it doesn’t always feel that way. Increasingly, property ownership comes with new conditions and costs that can limit what owners are allowed to do.

Understanding What’s Ahead

From Vancouver to San Francisco, Rhode Island, and Hawaii, property owners are facing new taxes and restrictions that challenge traditional ideas of ownership. As David Moore, Tom Moore, and Paul Locatelli discussed, the question remains: if it’s your real estate, should you still have the right to do what you want with it?

If you want to better understand how new tax policies could affect your investments or upcoming 1031 Exchange, reach out to the team at Equity Advantage. Their decades of experience can help you navigate ever-changing markets and be confident in all your investment decisions.

The Guys With All The Answers…

David and Thomas Moore, the co-founders of Equity Advantage & IRA Advantage

Whether working through a 1031 Exchange with Equity Advantage, acquiring real estate with an IRA through IRA Advantage or listing investment property through our Post 1031 property listing site, we are here to help Investors get where they want to be. Call them today! 503-635-1031.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept the Privacy Policy

"WASHINGTON STATE LAW, RCW 19.310.040, REQUIRES AN Exchange FACILITATOR TO EITHER MAINTAIN A FIDELITY BOND IN AN AMOUNT OF NOT LESS THAN ONE MILLION DOLLARS THAT PROTECTS CLIENTS AGAINST LOSSES CAUSED BY CRIMINAL ACTS OF THE Exchange FACILITATOR, OR HOLD ALL CLIENT FUNDS IN A QUALIFIED ESCROW ACCOUNT OR QUALIFIED TRUST." RCW 19.310.040(1)(b) (as amended)

Scroll to Top